One of the best ways to start a testy discussion is to mention the word “regulation” to a group of businessmen. In fact, I think it is one of the best ways to foment an argument other than asking most liberals if Fox News is “fair and balanced.” I wouldn’t think to use the word socialism in the same group just because I don’t need to be responsible for any sort of cardiac seizure that could take place.
As the examination and accusations arise from our current economic woes, there will be calls for reform and regulation to be applied to many of the residents of Wall Street. How effective any sort of revision of operating standards will be is directly proportional to the regulatory pressure that will be placed upon them. One fact that is always overlooked is the amount of raw intellectual talent that resides inside the Wall Street firms along with the vast amount of creative legal aptitude that can be hired to outman, outmaneuver and outgun any sort of process to regulate the financial service industry. In short, if a loophole is found or was engineered to exist, this group will exploit it for its own benefit. In fact the same can be said for almost any business interest group over most regulators.
This brings me to the auto glass industry and what the elections of 2008 may bring to us. The hot buttons for independents are third-party administrators, deceptive referrals and the easy entry within our tradecraft. While a case could be made concerning interstate commerce on the first two subjects, all three topics currently are regulated under individual state laws; therefore it would be very unlikely that any sort of wholesale changes have any sort of chance to take place. The question becomes what you, the participants in this industry, want to take place.
Here are a few observations about regulations and their future in our industry.
I haven’t fallen off the turnip truck hard enough to believe that a person or a group gets what they want simply due to wishing for it. It simply takes money, influence, the ability to shape one’s message, money and organization. (Did I mention money?) What I see is an abysmal lack of unity caused mainly due to self –interest and animosity between members of our industry. Simply put, that has to change or the exploitation and division fostered by some will continue to keep us divided and unable to withstand the pressure being currently brought to bear on us by efforts of corporate hybrid glass/cost containment companies.
Regulations are only as good as the effort made to enforce them. If you’re going to pass a law, mandate enough funds to implement it.
I still believe that the Auto Glass Replacement Safety Standard (AGRSS) Council would be better served to reach out to the public and sell themselves directly as a symbol of quality and safety. Audit its members to verify adherence to its standards and publicize why the consumer should be concerned about having a windshield safely installed.
Here’s an ironic observation: most states do not require auto glass installers to be licensed; however, cosmetologists must be, as well as dogs. The conclusion is rather obvious; hell hath no fury like a scalped woman. If a flying windshield does it, it’s not so much an issue, it seems.
Earning a license and maintaining some semblance of proficiency in keeping it in order to buy auto glass from a distributor is a workable concept. Why it lacks political will to do so is a question I can’t answer. Licensing will not stop some of the scurrilous installers that exist today, but to do nothing serves no one but the hacks that drag down the entire trade.
California is a wonderful example of licensing without the teeth of enforcement. Technically it is mandatory for any company that works on a car to have an auto repair license issued by the state. No professional ability or testing is required to apply or to receive a license making it meaningless to own unless one gets caught without one. The only way a company seems to get cited (and I have never seen an auto glass only shop get cited) is to commit insurance fraud in which a case is brought to legal authorities by a joint task force of insurance investigators. As the nation’s most populous state with the most roads and resident miles driven, it is a haven for some of the worst installers in this country. On any given day, I see people picking up glass at a distributor’s warehouse who hardly seem qualified to flip burgers much less able to drive a van or mini pick-up that I am ashamed to say profess a connection to the same thing I do. No political will exists for that condition to change. To see any car mutilated by some incompetent tech is just so frustrating. The sorry part is that the damage could have come from any sector of our industry.
We are being promised “change” in this election year. Whatever the outcome may take place; change is indeed going to come. We in auto glass already know about change. Our industry is amid major alterations brought on by corporate influences, globalization and local market conditions. To survive and prosper the best method is to think long-term and make quality your highest priority.
