I profess not to know my English literature as well as I should. However, the story lines of the decline and fall of Diamond could easily be found in a Shakespearian tragedy such as “King Lear” or “Hamlet.” The ending was more like “Much Ado About Nothing.” Allow me the chance to inform you and suggest what the Bard of Stratford could have written on the subject himself.
I’ll try to briefly summarize; we had in Diamond, the second largest installation company in the United States, a company notable for its discount pricing. (Some rise by sin or by virtue fall.) For some reason they took on a close to a $100 million in debt ten years ago that became due this year. While profitable, they cannot repay or refinance the loan. (Neither a borrower nor lender be.)
The only way to remove the debt was to enter bankruptcy and liquidate. I would bet a tube of urethane that Mr. Levine and cohorts had planned from the very start to enter bankruptcy and buy back the company, free of many of the obligations it existed under previously. (It’s a wise father that knows his own child.) Here is where it gets interesting. The assets of Diamond were at last exposed to view and to be bid upon, open to anyone with interest. Kingston had to expect that Belron would naturally investigate and bid on those assets. It would just be a matter of beating that bid and anyone else’s. (Nothing can come of nothing.)
The news came on June 20 that Mr. Levine’ s poker prowess was proven vulnerable. His group’s bid suspiciously fell only $100,000 short of the winning Belron number of $54 million. Conspiracy theorists may want to consult with corporate espionage experts to try to explain those circumstances. The gamble failed. The nation’s largest auto glass installation company was able to absorb its largest competitor for about three and half months worth of Diamond’s gross sales and do it without a national price war. (The most unkind cut of all.)
What will this mean for the rest of the industry? I know many independents have differing opinions. Predicting outcomes can be a very chancy activity. Crystal balls are not noted for their accuracy.
For the next year of so, Belron will be busy finding out what they bought at this corporate garage sale, which personnel they want to keep or let go and still operate their own core businesses. (Many a good hanging prevents a bad marriage.) You could even wonder if the naming of a new CEO at Safelite was related to the Diamond bid since the timing was so approximate. (There’s many a man with more hair than wit.)
Metaphorically speaking, one would have to think they might be a bit like a python that just swallowed a large animal and needs time for digestion. Once that process takes place, its appetite and attitude would be one that others will and should be wary of. This increase of market share and the removal of its largest rival will put Belron US in an enviable position of power and influence throughout the auto glass industry. (He’s mad that trusts the tameness of a wolf.)
One would bet another tube of urethane that the dismantling of Diamond and the national branding efforts of Safelite will go forward hand-in-hand. Columbus will merge or close overlapping branches along with re-naming those that give Safelite entrance into new markets. (What is in a name? That which we would call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet.)
Some view this acquisition as a good thing that may slow declining retail or insurance pricing with the removal of the Avis of our industry who tried very hard to gain market share through discounting. Time will tell but the Canadian history of Belron suggests otherwise. (Fishes live in the sea, as men do a-land, the great ones eat up the little ones.)
You would also have to believe that the industry would begin to see an influx of new start-ups shops or services created by those former Diamond and even Safelite employees shed by the new merger. From managers to installers there will be attempts to retain certain customers with whom they have had personal contact as they try to establish a new business presence. (Who steals my purse steals trash.)
Adhesive and moulding vendors, along with glass distributors, that called Diamond but not Safelite a customer will suffer declines in transactions in an already soft market. Sadly, many times, these start-up installation firms are gladly welcomed by these businesses trying to offset lost sales. The result just becomes an engorged market of providers that depress profitability for those already in business. (Hell is empty and all the devils are here.)
This acquisition even may very well affect PPG selling its auto glass section. If anyone wants to challenge Belron, they would certainly need the manufacturing, distribution and installation facilities that PPG possesses. If that one single corporate entity can’t be found, it will be interesting to see what PPG decides to do in ridding itself of its seemingly redheaded stepchild. (What’s gone and what’s past help?)
In short, there will be plenty of ripples on our little pond because of this auction’s result. However, good old Will said it best: “The patient must minister to himself” and “To thy own self be true.”
